Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Association of bystander interventions and hospital length of stay and admission to intensive care unit in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Prevalence and incidence of various Cancer subtypes in patients with heart failure vs matched controls

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Antihypertensive Drugs and Risk of Depression: A Nationwide Population-Based Study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Long-term impact of baseline anaemia on clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention in stable angina

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Self-reported health status and the associated risk of mortality in heart failure: The DANISH trial

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  5. Differences in mortality in patients undergoing surgery for infective endocarditis according to age and valvular surgery

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: The impact of bystander interventions on post-arrest hospital course is sparsely studied. We examined the association between bystander interventions and length of hospital stay and admission to intensive care unit (ICU) in one-day survivors after OHCA.

METHODS: This cohort study linked data of 4641 one-day OHCA survivors from 2001 to 2014 to data on hospital length of stay and ICU admission. We examined associations between bystander efforts and outcomes using regression, adjusted for age, sex, comorbidities, calendar year and witnessed status. We divided bystander efforts into three categories: 1. No bystander interventions; 2.Bystander CPR only; 3. Bystander defibrillation with or without bystander CPR.

RESULTS: For patients surviving to hospital discharge, hospital length of stay was 20days for patients without bystander interventions, compared to 16 for bystander CPR, and 13 for bystander defibrillation. 82% of patients without bystander interventions were admitted to ICU compared to 77.2% for bystander CPR, and 61.2% for bystander defibrillation. In-hospital mortality was 60% in the first category compared to 40.5% and 21.7% in the two latter categories. In regression models, bystander CPR and bystander defibrillation were associated with a reduction of length of hospital stay of 21% (Estimate: 0.79 [95% CI: 0.72-0.86]) and 32% (Estimate: 0.68 [95% CI: 0.59-0.78]), respectively. Both bystander CPR (OR: 0.94 [95% CI: 0.91-0.97]) and bystander defibrillation (OR: 0.81 [0.76-0.85]), were associated with lower risk of ICU admission.

CONCLUSIONS: Bystander interventions were associated with reduced hospital length of stay and ICU admission, suggesting that these efforts improve recovery in OHCA survivors.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftResuscitation
Vol/bind119
Sider (fra-til)99-106
Antal sider7
ISSN0300-9572
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 14 jul. 2017

ID: 51610500