Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
E-pub ahead of print

Assessment of assumptions of statistical analysis methods in randomised clinical trials: the what and how

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Should antidepressants be used for major depressive disorder?

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  2. Assessing assumptions for statistical analyses in randomised clinical trials

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Updated 2018 NICE guideline on pharmacological treatments for people with ADHD: a critical look

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. The Cochrane HPV vaccine review was incomplete and ignored important evidence of bias

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  1. Should antidepressants be used for major depressive disorder?

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  2. The PANSAID Randomized Clinical Trial: A pre-planned 1-year follow-up regarding harm

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

When analysing and presenting results ofrandomised clinical trials, trialists rarely report if or how underlying statisticalassumptions were validated. To avoid data-driven biased trial results, it should be common practice to prospectively describe the assessments of underlying assumptions. In existing literature, there is no consensus onhow trialists should assess and report underlying assumptions for the analysesof randomised clinical trials. With this study, we developed suggestions on howto test and validate underlying assumptions behind logistic regression, linearregression, and Cox regression when analysing results of randomised clinicaltrials.Two investigators compiled an initial draft based on a review of the literature. Experienced statisticians and trialists from eight different research centres and trial units then participated in a anonymised consensus process, where we reached agreement on the suggestions presented in this paper.This paper provides detailed suggestions on 1) whichunderlying statistical assumptions behind logistic regression, multiple linear regression and Cox regressioneach should be assessed; 2) how these underlying assumptions may be assessed;and 3) what to do if these assumptions are violated.We believe that the validity of randomised clinical trial results will increase if our recommendations for assessing and dealing with violations of the underlying statistical assumptions are followed.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftBMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
ISSN1356-5524
DOI
StatusE-pub ahead of print - 27 jan. 2020

Bibliografisk note

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

ID: 59221992