Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Assessment of assumptions of statistical analysis methods in randomised clinical trials: the what and how

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Methylphenidate for ADHD rejected from the WHO Essential Medicines List due to uncertainties in benefit-harm profile

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Blinding in randomised clinical trials of psychological interventions: a retrospective study of published trial reports

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Considerations on the strengths and limitations of using disease-related mortality as an outcome in clinical research

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKommentar/debatForskningpeer review

  4. Seeing is believing – the problem of blinding in psychological research

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftLetterForskning

Vis graf over relationer

When analysing and presenting results ofrandomised clinical trials, trialists rarely report if or how underlying statisticalassumptions were validated. To avoid data-driven biased trial results, it should be common practice to prospectively describe the assessments of underlying assumptions. In existing literature, there is no consensus onhow trialists should assess and report underlying assumptions for the analysesof randomised clinical trials. With this study, we developed suggestions on howto test and validate underlying assumptions behind logistic regression, linearregression, and Cox regression when analysing results of randomised clinicaltrials.Two investigators compiled an initial draft based on a review of the literature. Experienced statisticians and trialists from eight different research centres and trial units then participated in a anonymised consensus process, where we reached agreement on the suggestions presented in this paper.This paper provides detailed suggestions on 1) whichunderlying statistical assumptions behind logistic regression, multiple linear regression and Cox regressioneach should be assessed; 2) how these underlying assumptions may be assessed;and 3) what to do if these assumptions are violated.We believe that the validity of randomised clinical trial results will increase if our recommendations for assessing and dealing with violations of the underlying statistical assumptions are followed.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummer111268
TidsskriftBMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
Vol/bind26
Udgave nummer3
Sider (fra-til)121-126
Antal sider6
ISSN1356-5524
DOI
StatusUdgivet - jun. 2021

ID: 59221992