Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
E-pub ahead of print

Assessing competence in cochlear implant surgery using the newly developed Cochlear Implant Surgery Assessment Tool

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. COVID-19 infection rate among tertiary referral center otorhinolaryngology healthcare workers

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Content validity evidence for a simulation-based test of handheld otoscopy skills

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. European white paper: oropharyngeal dysphagia in head and neck cancer

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Education in the placement of ultrasound-guided peripheral venous catheters: a systematic review

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  2. Defining the surgical footprint in cataract surgery: patient-related outcomes dependent on the experience of the surgeon

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Reliable and valid assessment of procedural skills in resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA)

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Vestibular Function in Pendred Syndrome: Intact High Frequency VOR and Saccular Hypersensitivity

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

PURPOSE: To develop and gather validity evidence for a novel tool for assessment of cochlear implant (CI) surgery, including virtual reality CI surgery training.

METHODS: Prospective study gathering validity evidence according to Messick's framework. Four experts developed the CI Surgery Assessment Tool (CISAT). A total of 35 true novices (medical students), trained novices (residents) and CI surgeons performed two CI-procedures each in the Visible Ear Simulator, which were rated by three blinded experts. Classical test theory and generalizability theory were used for reliability analysis.

RESULTS: The CISAT significantly discriminated between the three groups (p < 0.001). The generalizability coefficient was 0.76 and most of the score variance (53.3%) was attributable to the participant and only 6.8% to the raters. When exploring a standard setting for CI surgery, the contrasting groups method suggested a pass/fail score of 36.0 points (out of 55), but since the trained novices performed above this, we propose using the mean CI surgeon performance score (45.3 points).

CONCLUSION: Validity evidence for simulation-based assessment of CI performance supports the CISAT. Together with the standard setting, the CISAT might be used to monitor progress in competency-based training of CI surgery and to determine when the trainee can advance to further training.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
ISSN0003-9195
DOI
StatusE-pub ahead of print - 19 feb. 2021

ID: 62375321