Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Are depressive disorders caused by psychosocial stressors at work? A systematic review with metaanalysis

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewpeer review

DOI

  1. Vegetable nitrate intake, blood pressure and incident cardiovascular disease: Danish Diet, Cancer, and Health Study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Body mass index and height in relation to type 2 diabetes by levels of intelligence and education in a large cohort of Danish men

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. National all-cause mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic: a Danish registry-based study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Maternal use of hormonal contraception and risk of childhood ADHD: a nationwide population‑based cohort study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Wearing Occlusive Gloves Increases the Density of Staphylococcus aureus in Patients with Hand Eczema

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskning

  2. Chronic productive cough and inhalant occupational exposure-a study of the general population

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

In the last decade, many studies have examined associations between poor psychosocial work environment and depression. We aimed to assess the evidence for a causal association between psychosocial factors at work and depressive disorders. We conducted a systematic literature search from 1980 to March 2019. For all exposures other than night and shift work and long working hours, we limited our selection of studies to those with a longitudinal design. We extracted available risk estimates for each of 19 psychosocial exposures, from which we calculated summary risk estimates with 95% confidence intervals (PROSPERO, identifier CRD42019130266). 54 studies were included, addressing 19 exposures and 11 different measures of depression. Only data on depressive episodes were sufficient for evaluation. Heterogeneity of exposure definitions and ascertainment, outcome measures, risk parameterization and effect contrasts limited the validity of meta-analyses. Summary risk estimates were above unity for all but one exposure, and below 1.60 for all but another. Outcome measures were liable to high rates of false positives, control of relevant confounding was mostly inadequate, and common method bias was likely in a large proportion of studies. The combination of resulting biases is likely to have inflated observed effect estimates. When statistical uncertainties and the potential for bias and confounding are taken into account, it is not possible to conclude with confidence that any of the psychosocial exposures at work included in this review is either likely or unlikely to cause depressive episodes or recurrent depressive disorders.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftEuropean Journal of Epidemiology
Vol/bind36
Udgave nummer5
Sider (fra-til)479-496
Antal sider18
ISSN0393-2990
DOI
StatusUdgivet - maj 2021

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Danish Working Environment Research Fund, grant nr. 45–2018-09.

ID: 63752500