Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Antiepileptic drugs as prophylaxis for de novo brain tumour-related epilepsy after craniotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of harm and benefits

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Misfolded SOD1 inclusions in patients with mutations in C9orf72 and other ALS/FTD-associated genes

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Muscle MRI in a large cohort of patients with oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. In utero exposure to antiepileptic drugs is associated with learning disabilities among offspring

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: consensus guidelines on management

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  5. Limb girdle muscular dystrophy due to mutations in POMT2

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Clinical and histopathological predictors of outcome in malignant meningioma

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Improved Survival of Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With Head and Neck Soft Tissue Sarcomas in Denmark

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Why are antiepileptic drugs continued after successful epilepsy surgery in adults?

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures treated with psychotherapy: Long-term outcome on seizures and healthcare utilization

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

OBJECTIVES: To investigate potential harm and benefits of antiepileptic drugs (AED) given prophylactically to prevent de novo brain tumour-related epilepsy after craniotomy.

METHODS: Randomised controlled trials (RCT) and retrospective studies published before 27 November 2018 were included. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were applied. Eligible patients were diagnosed with a brain tumour, were seizure naïve and underwent craniotomy. The random effects model was used for quantitative synthesis. The analysis was adjusted for the confounding effect of including patients with a history of seizure prior to study inclusion.

RESULTS: A total of 454 patients received prophylactic AED whereas 333 were allocated to placebo or no treatment. Two RCTs and four retrospective studies were identified. The OR was 1.09 (95% CI 0.7 to 1.8, p=0.7, I2=5.6%, χ2 p=0.5), indicating study consistency and no significant differences. An additional two RCTs and one retrospective study combined craniotomy and diagnostic biopsy, and were subgroup analysed-which supported no difference in odds for epilepsy.

CONCLUSIONS: A prophylactic effect of AED could not be demonstrated (nor rejected statistically). Levetiracetam was associated with less adverse effects than phenytoin. The potential harm of AED was not balanced by the potential prophylactic benefit. This study suggests that prophylactic AED should not be administered to prevent brain tumour-related epilepsy after craniotomy.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry
Vol/bind90
Udgave nummer5
Sider (fra-til)599-607
Antal sider9
ISSN0022-3050
DOI
StatusUdgivet - maj 2019

Bibliografisk note

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

ID: 58216832