Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Anastomotic complications after robot-assisted laparoscopic and open radical prostatectomy

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Robotic versus laparoscopic urological surgery: incidence of reoperation and complications

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Successful extraction of sperm cells after autologous bone marrow transplant: a case report

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. The prognostic impact of incidental prostate cancer following radical cystoprostatectomy: a nationwide analysis

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. National incidence and survival of patients with non-invasive papillary urothelial carcinoma: a Danish population study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  5. Implantation of the argus sling in a hard-to-treat patient group with urinary stress incontinence

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Active Surveillance Versus Radical Prostatectomy in Favorable-risk Localized Prostate Cancer

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Risk of cardiovascular events in men treated for prostate cancer compared with prostate cancer-free men

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Prostate Artery Embolization for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Men Unfit for Surgery

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. 5hmC Level Predicts Biochemical Failure Following Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer Patients with ERG Negative Tumors

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

Objective Anastomotic complications are well known after radical prostatectomy (RP). The vesicourethral anastomotic technique is handled differently between open and robotic RP. The aim of the study was to investigate whether the frequency of anastomotic leakages and strictures differed between patients undergoing retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP) and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and to identify risk factors associated with these complications. Materials and methods The study included 735 consecutive patients who underwent RRP (n = 499) or RARP (236) at the Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet, Denmark, in a complete 3 year period from 2010 to 2012. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to analyse associations between surgical procedure (RRP vs RARP) and anastomotic complications. Analyses included age, smoking status, diabetes, hypertension, surgeon, prostate volume and anastomotic leakage as variables. Owing to a low number of events, multivariable analyses only included smoking status, diabetes and prostate volume for anastomotic leakage, and age, smoking status, prostate volume and anastomotic leakage for anastomotic strictures. Results The frequency of anastomotic leakage was 2.9%. Anastomotic stricture was seen in 4.9% of patients during follow-up. No differences were found in the frequency of anastomotic leakage (p = 0.35) or strictures (p = 0.35) between RRP and RARP. Univariate analysis demonstrated an association between surgeon and the risk of anastomotic strictures in RRP patients (p = 0.02). No other independent risk factors were identified. Conclusion Overall, the anastomotic complication rate in this cohort is similar to other published reports. No obvious risk factors for anastomotic complications could be identified, which in part was due to the low number of events.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftScandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology
Vol/bind50
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)274-9
Antal sider6
ISSN0036-5599
DOI
StatusUdgivet - aug. 2016

ID: 46337761