TY - JOUR
T1 - An optimal curriculum for training in endoscopic ultrasound
T2 - a summarized evidence-based literature systematic review
AU - Montanelli, Julieta
AU - Hernandez Lara, Ariosto Honorio
AU - Uribe Rivera, Ana Karla
AU - Verde, Juan Manuel
AU - Burmester, Eike
AU - Al-Haddad, Mohammad A.
AU - Hollerbach, Stephan
AU - Vilmann, Peter
AU - Abu-Suboh Abadia, Monder
AU - Badaoui, Abdenor
AU - Arcidiacono, Paolo Giorgio
AU - Schlag, Christoph
AU - Poley, Jan Werner
AU - Grandval, Philippe
AU - Sosa-Valencia, Leonardo
AU - Swanström, Lee
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2025.
PY - 2025/7
Y1 - 2025/7
N2 - Background and Objectives: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) training is strongly correlated with procedure quality and improved patient outcomes. However, EUS fellowship curricula and the environment in which training should take place are not well defined. A well-structured training curriculum should aim to establish a universally accepted competence framework before endosonographers are allowed to start independent practice. This systematic review seeks to identify the essential components of an EUS training curriculum, determine the optimal environment for this training, and highlight gaps and inconsistencies in current guidelines. Material and Methods: A comprehensive literature review was performed using different databases (PubMed, Science Direct, Cochrane library, Directory of Open Access Journals, and Google Scholar) using Mesh methodology for keyword search in the field of EUS training and following PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria were review articles, original research articles, international societal guidelines, book chapters, and expert consensus addressing EUS educational aspects published in the last two decades (January 2002–August 2023) in peer-reviewed journals in English. Results: A total of 49 papers were included according to the inclusion criteria in the 20-year period range, from which 31 assessed diagnostic EUS curricula content and 19 any aspect of the therapeutic EUS curricula. The requisites, duration, and/or competence demonstration strategies were addressed in 28 publications, whereas 15 referred to the adequate environment for EUS training. Overall, there was a consensus on the need for a structured, formal EUS curriculum along with standardized and properly supervised training and assessment to ensure competence. Conclusion: The establishment of a structured EUS fellowship curricula should aim to produce competent practitioners, thereby ensuring safe and effective patient-care, uniformly and at the international level. While there is general agreement in the literature on the major aspects of a training curriculum, which we synthesize here, the ideal EUS training context deserves further study and better definition.
AB - Background and Objectives: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) training is strongly correlated with procedure quality and improved patient outcomes. However, EUS fellowship curricula and the environment in which training should take place are not well defined. A well-structured training curriculum should aim to establish a universally accepted competence framework before endosonographers are allowed to start independent practice. This systematic review seeks to identify the essential components of an EUS training curriculum, determine the optimal environment for this training, and highlight gaps and inconsistencies in current guidelines. Material and Methods: A comprehensive literature review was performed using different databases (PubMed, Science Direct, Cochrane library, Directory of Open Access Journals, and Google Scholar) using Mesh methodology for keyword search in the field of EUS training and following PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria were review articles, original research articles, international societal guidelines, book chapters, and expert consensus addressing EUS educational aspects published in the last two decades (January 2002–August 2023) in peer-reviewed journals in English. Results: A total of 49 papers were included according to the inclusion criteria in the 20-year period range, from which 31 assessed diagnostic EUS curricula content and 19 any aspect of the therapeutic EUS curricula. The requisites, duration, and/or competence demonstration strategies were addressed in 28 publications, whereas 15 referred to the adequate environment for EUS training. Overall, there was a consensus on the need for a structured, formal EUS curriculum along with standardized and properly supervised training and assessment to ensure competence. Conclusion: The establishment of a structured EUS fellowship curricula should aim to produce competent practitioners, thereby ensuring safe and effective patient-care, uniformly and at the international level. While there is general agreement in the literature on the major aspects of a training curriculum, which we synthesize here, the ideal EUS training context deserves further study and better definition.
KW - Curriculum
KW - Education
KW - Endoscopic ultrasonography
KW - Training
KW - Clinical Competence
KW - Humans
KW - Curriculum/standards
KW - Education, Medical, Graduate/methods
KW - Endosonography/standards
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105005963123&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00464-025-11783-5
DO - 10.1007/s00464-025-11783-5
M3 - Review
C2 - 40410620
AN - SCOPUS:105005963123
SN - 0930-2794
VL - 39
SP - 4076
EP - 4093
JO - Surgical Endoscopy
JF - Surgical Endoscopy
IS - 7
ER -