TY - JOUR
T1 - AI Improves Agreement and Reduces Time for Quantifying Metabolic Tumour Burden in Hodgkin Lymphoma †
AU - Sadik, May
AU - Barrington, Sally F.
AU - Ulén, Johannes
AU - Enqvist, Olof
AU - Trägårdh, Elin
AU - Saboury, Babak
AU - Lerberg Nielsen, Anne
AU - Loft, Annika
AU - Loaiza Gongora, Jose Luis
AU - Lopez Urdaneta, Jesus
AU - Kumar, Rajender
AU - van Essen, Martijn
AU - Edenbrandt, Lars
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 by the authors.
PY - 2025/12
Y1 - 2025/12
N2 - Background: The aim was to evaluate whether an artificial intelligence (AI)-based tool for the automated quantification of the total metabolic tumour volume (tMTV) in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) could support nuclear medicine specialists in lesion segmentation and thereby enhance inter-observer agreement. Methods: Forty-eight consecutive patients who underwent staging with [18F]FDG PET/CT were included. Eight invited specialists from different hospitals were asked to manually segment lesions for tMTV calculations in 12 cases without AI advice, and to use automated AI segmentation in a further 12 cases, with editing as required, i.e., segmenting/adjusting 24 cases each. Each case was segmented by two specialists manually and by two different specialists using the AI tool, allowing for the pairwise comparison of inter-observer variability. Results: The median difference between two specialists performing manual tMTV segmentations was 26 cm3 (IQR 10–86 cm3) corresponding to 23% (IQR 7–50%) of the median tMTV in the dataset, while the median difference between two specialists tMTV adjustments using AI segmentations was 12 cm3 (IQR 4–39 cm3) corresponding to 9% (IQR 2–21%) (p = 0.023). The median difference in tMTV between measurements with and without AI was 3.3 cm3, corresponding to 2.3% of the median tMTV. Conclusions: An automated AI-based tool can significantly increase agreement among specialists quantifying tMTV in HL patients staged with [18F]FDG PET/CT, without markedly changing the measurements.
AB - Background: The aim was to evaluate whether an artificial intelligence (AI)-based tool for the automated quantification of the total metabolic tumour volume (tMTV) in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) could support nuclear medicine specialists in lesion segmentation and thereby enhance inter-observer agreement. Methods: Forty-eight consecutive patients who underwent staging with [18F]FDG PET/CT were included. Eight invited specialists from different hospitals were asked to manually segment lesions for tMTV calculations in 12 cases without AI advice, and to use automated AI segmentation in a further 12 cases, with editing as required, i.e., segmenting/adjusting 24 cases each. Each case was segmented by two specialists manually and by two different specialists using the AI tool, allowing for the pairwise comparison of inter-observer variability. Results: The median difference between two specialists performing manual tMTV segmentations was 26 cm3 (IQR 10–86 cm3) corresponding to 23% (IQR 7–50%) of the median tMTV in the dataset, while the median difference between two specialists tMTV adjustments using AI segmentations was 12 cm3 (IQR 4–39 cm3) corresponding to 9% (IQR 2–21%) (p = 0.023). The median difference in tMTV between measurements with and without AI was 3.3 cm3, corresponding to 2.3% of the median tMTV. Conclusions: An automated AI-based tool can significantly increase agreement among specialists quantifying tMTV in HL patients staged with [18F]FDG PET/CT, without markedly changing the measurements.
KW - artificial intelligence
KW - Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
KW - Hodgkin disease
KW - observer variation
KW - total metabolic tumour volume
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105025671774&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/hematolrep17060060
DO - 10.3390/hematolrep17060060
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 41283236
AN - SCOPUS:105025671774
SN - 2038-8322
VL - 17
JO - Hematology Reports
JF - Hematology Reports
IS - 6
M1 - 60
ER -