TY - JOUR
T1 - Affective and non-affective cognition in patients with bipolar disorder type I and type II in full or partial remission
T2 - Associations with familial risk
AU - Jensen, Mette Bagge
AU - Kjærstad, Hanne Lie
AU - Coello, Klara
AU - Stanislaus, Sharleny
AU - Melbye, Sigurd
AU - Sletved, Kimie Ormstrup
AU - Vinberg, Maj
AU - Kessing, Lars Vedel
AU - Miskowiak, Kamilla Woznica
N1 - Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/3/15
Y1 - 2021/3/15
N2 - BACKGROUND: The upcoming conversion of the ICD-11 will subdivide patients with bipolar disorder (BD) into BD type I (BD-I) and BD type II (BD-II). This study aimed to investigate whether cognitive impairments could aid as objective cognitive biomarkers for recently diagnosed BD subtypes by comparing cognitive profiles between BD subtypes, their unaffected relatives (UR), and healthy controls (HC).METHODS: The sample included 76 patients with BD-I, 149 patients with BD-II, 28 UR of patients with BD-I (UR-I), 50 UR of patients with BD-II (UR-II) and 168 HC from the Bipolar Illness Onset study, who were assessed with an extensive non-affective and affective cognitive test battery.RESULTS: The results showed no significant differences in affective or non-affective cognition between BD-I and BD-II. Compared to HC, patients with BD-I (but not BD-II) showed worse performance in verbal fluency (p = .01) and were slower at recognising fearful faces (p = .045), while patients with BD-II (but not BD-I) displayed generally poorer recognition of facial expressions (p = .02). Only UR-I showed lower performance on verbal fluency (p = .049) and aberrant affective cognition (ps≤.047) compared to HC.LIMITATIONS: The potential confounding effects of medication were not explored.CONCLUSIONS: The lack of significant differences in cognitive profiles between recently diagnosed BD-I and BD-II suggests that neither affective nor non-affective cognition are indicative of BD subtype.
AB - BACKGROUND: The upcoming conversion of the ICD-11 will subdivide patients with bipolar disorder (BD) into BD type I (BD-I) and BD type II (BD-II). This study aimed to investigate whether cognitive impairments could aid as objective cognitive biomarkers for recently diagnosed BD subtypes by comparing cognitive profiles between BD subtypes, their unaffected relatives (UR), and healthy controls (HC).METHODS: The sample included 76 patients with BD-I, 149 patients with BD-II, 28 UR of patients with BD-I (UR-I), 50 UR of patients with BD-II (UR-II) and 168 HC from the Bipolar Illness Onset study, who were assessed with an extensive non-affective and affective cognitive test battery.RESULTS: The results showed no significant differences in affective or non-affective cognition between BD-I and BD-II. Compared to HC, patients with BD-I (but not BD-II) showed worse performance in verbal fluency (p = .01) and were slower at recognising fearful faces (p = .045), while patients with BD-II (but not BD-I) displayed generally poorer recognition of facial expressions (p = .02). Only UR-I showed lower performance on verbal fluency (p = .049) and aberrant affective cognition (ps≤.047) compared to HC.LIMITATIONS: The potential confounding effects of medication were not explored.CONCLUSIONS: The lack of significant differences in cognitive profiles between recently diagnosed BD-I and BD-II suggests that neither affective nor non-affective cognition are indicative of BD subtype.
KW - Bipolar Disorder
KW - Cognition
KW - Cognition Disorders
KW - Genetic Predisposition to Disease
KW - Humans
KW - Neuropsychological Tests
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100433186&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jad.2021.01.074
DO - 10.1016/j.jad.2021.01.074
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 33561801
SN - 0165-0327
VL - 283
SP - 207
EP - 215
JO - Journal of Affective Disorders
JF - Journal of Affective Disorders
ER -