Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Adductor canal block for postoperative pain treatment after revision knee arthroplasty: a blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Assessment of the sublingual microcirculation with the GlycoCheck system: Reproducibility and examination conditions

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Novel functions of the luteinizing hormone/chorionic gonadotropin receptor in prostate cancer cells and patients

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Hepatitis C prevalence in Denmark in 2016-An updated estimate using multiple national registers

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Inflammation, non-endothelial dependent coronary microvascular function and diastolic function-Are they linked?

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: Revision knee arthroplasty is assumed to be even more painful than primary knee arthroplasty and predominantly performed in chronic pain patients, which challenges postoperative pain treatment. We hypothesized that the adductor canal block, effective for pain relief after primary total knee arthroplasty, may reduce pain during knee flexion (primary endpoint: at 4 h) compared with placebo after revision total knee arthroplasty. Secondary endpoints were pain at rest, morphine consumption and morphine-related side effects.

METHODS: We included patients scheduled for revision knee arthroplasty in general anesthesia into this blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized trial. Patients were allocated to an adductor canal block via a catheter with either ropivacaine or placebo; bolus of 0.75% ropivacaine/saline, followed by infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine/saline. Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT01191593.

RESULTS: We enrolled 36 patients, of which 30 were analyzed. Mean pain scores during knee flexion at 4 h (primary endpoint) were: 52±22 versus 71±25 mm (mean difference 19, 95% CI: 1 to 37, P = 0.04), ropivacaine and placebo group respectively. When calculated as area under the curve (1-8 h/7 h) pain scores were 55±21 versus 69±21 mm during knee flexion (P = 0.11) and 39±18 versus 45±23 mm at rest (P = 0.43), ropivacaine and placebo group respectively. Groups were similar regarding morphine consumption and morphine-related side effects (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS: The only statistically significant difference found between groups was in the primary endpoint: pain during knee flexion at 4 h. However, due to a larger than anticipated dropout rate and heterogeneous study population, the study was underpowered.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01191593.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftP L o S One
Vol/bind9
Udgave nummer11
Sider (fra-til)e111951
ISSN1932-6203
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2014

ID: 44708779