TY - JOUR
T1 - Acute relief of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction by inhaled formoterol in children with persistent asthma
AU - Hermansen, Mette Northman
AU - Nielsen, Kim Gjerum
AU - Buchvald, Frederik
AU - Jespersen, Jakob Jessing
AU - Bengtsson, Thomas
AU - Bisgaard, Hans
PY - 2006/5
Y1 - 2006/5
N2 - STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the acute bronchodilatory effect of the long-acting beta2-agonist formoterol against the short-acting beta2-agonist (SABA) terbutaline during exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) in children with asthma.DESIGN: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of the immediate effect of formoterol, 9 microg, vs terbutaline, 0.5 mg, and placebo administered as dry powder at different study days. Exercise challenge test was used as a model of acute bronchoconstriction.PATIENTS: Twenty-four 7- to 15-year-old children with persistent asthma.INTERVENTIONS: The children performed standardized treadmill exercise tests, breathing dry air, with a submaximal workload. Study medication was administered 5 min after exercise if FEV1 dropped > or = 15% within 5 min after exercise. FEV1 and forced expiratory flows were measured repeatedly until 60 min after dose.RESULTS: Formoterol and terbutaline offered a significant acute bronchodilatory effect from 3 min after dose compared with placebo (p < 0.001). There was no difference between formoterol and terbutaline in FEV1 5 min after dose (p = 0.15), with a mean increase from each predrug baseline of 62% of the maximum increase for both. Median times to recovery within 5% of baseline FEV1 were 5.0 min and 7.4 min for formoterol and terbutaline, respectively (p = 0.33).CONCLUSION: Single-dose formoterol, 9 microg, via dry powder inhaler provided an acute bronchodilatory effect similar to terbutaline during EIB in schoolchildren with persistent asthma. Formoterol is at least as effective as SABA and may be considered an alternative in the treatment of acute bronchoconstriction in school children.
AB - STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the acute bronchodilatory effect of the long-acting beta2-agonist formoterol against the short-acting beta2-agonist (SABA) terbutaline during exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) in children with asthma.DESIGN: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of the immediate effect of formoterol, 9 microg, vs terbutaline, 0.5 mg, and placebo administered as dry powder at different study days. Exercise challenge test was used as a model of acute bronchoconstriction.PATIENTS: Twenty-four 7- to 15-year-old children with persistent asthma.INTERVENTIONS: The children performed standardized treadmill exercise tests, breathing dry air, with a submaximal workload. Study medication was administered 5 min after exercise if FEV1 dropped > or = 15% within 5 min after exercise. FEV1 and forced expiratory flows were measured repeatedly until 60 min after dose.RESULTS: Formoterol and terbutaline offered a significant acute bronchodilatory effect from 3 min after dose compared with placebo (p < 0.001). There was no difference between formoterol and terbutaline in FEV1 5 min after dose (p = 0.15), with a mean increase from each predrug baseline of 62% of the maximum increase for both. Median times to recovery within 5% of baseline FEV1 were 5.0 min and 7.4 min for formoterol and terbutaline, respectively (p = 0.33).CONCLUSION: Single-dose formoterol, 9 microg, via dry powder inhaler provided an acute bronchodilatory effect similar to terbutaline during EIB in schoolchildren with persistent asthma. Formoterol is at least as effective as SABA and may be considered an alternative in the treatment of acute bronchoconstriction in school children.
KW - Administration, Inhalation
KW - Adolescent
KW - Adrenergic beta-Agonists
KW - Asthma
KW - Bronchoconstriction
KW - Child
KW - Cross-Over Studies
KW - Delayed-Action Preparations
KW - Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
KW - Double-Blind Method
KW - Ethanolamines
KW - Exercise Test
KW - Female
KW - Follow-Up Studies
KW - Forced Expiratory Volume
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Treatment Outcome
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/33646482556
U2 - 10.1378/chest.129.5.1203
DO - 10.1378/chest.129.5.1203
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 16685010
SN - 0012-3692
VL - 129
SP - 1203
EP - 1209
JO - Chest
JF - Chest
IS - 5
ER -