Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Active surveillance for localized prostate cancer: An analysis of patient contacts and utilization of healthcare resources

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Robotic versus laparoscopic urological surgery: incidence of reoperation and complications

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Successful extraction of sperm cells after autologous bone marrow transplant: a case report

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. The prognostic impact of incidental prostate cancer following radical cystoprostatectomy: a nationwide analysis

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. National incidence and survival of patients with non-invasive papillary urothelial carcinoma: a Danish population study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  5. Implantation of the argus sling in a hard-to-treat patient group with urinary stress incontinence

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Active Surveillance Versus Radical Prostatectomy in Favorable-risk Localized Prostate Cancer

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Risk of cardiovascular events in men treated for prostate cancer compared with prostate cancer-free men

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Prostate Artery Embolization for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Men Unfit for Surgery

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

Abstract Objective. Evidence supports active surveillance (AS) as a means to reduce overtreatment of low-risk prostate cancer (PCa). The consequences of close and long-standing follow-up with regard to outpatient visits, tests and repeated biopsies are widely unknown. This study investigated the trajectory and costs of AS in patients with localized PCa. Materials and methods. In total, 317 PCa patients were followed in a prospective, single-arm AS cohort. The primary outcomes were number of patient contacts, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests, biopsies, hospital admissions due to biopsy complications and patients eventually undergoing curative treatment. The secondary outcome was cost. Results. The 5 year cumulative incidence of discontinued AS in a competing-risk model was 40%. During the first 5 years of AS patients underwent a median of two biopsy sets, and patients were seen in an outpatient clinic including PSA testing three to four times annually. In total, 38 of the 406 biopsy sessions led to hospital admission and 87 of the 317 patients required treatment for bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). With a median of 3.7 years' follow-up, the total cost of AS was euro (€) 1,240,286. Assuming all patients had otherwise undergone primary radical prostatectomy, the cost difference favoured AS with a net benefit of €662,661 (35% reduction). Conclusions. AS entails a close clinical follow-up with a considerable risk of rebiopsy complication, treatment of BOO and subsequent delayed definitive therapy. This risk should be weighed against a potential economic benefit and reduction in the risk of overtreatment compared to immediate radical treatment.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftScandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology
Vol/bind49
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)43-50
Antal sider8
ISSN0036-5599
DOI
StatusUdgivet - feb. 2015

ID: 44854110