Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Accuracy of visual scoring and semi-quantification of ultrasound strain elastography - a phantom study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Assessment of the sublingual microcirculation with the GlycoCheck system: Reproducibility and examination conditions

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Novel functions of the luteinizing hormone/chorionic gonadotropin receptor in prostate cancer cells and patients

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Hepatitis C prevalence in Denmark in 2016-An updated estimate using multiple national registers

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Inflammation, non-endothelial dependent coronary microvascular function and diastolic function-Are they linked?

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of strain elastography in an elasticity phantom and to assess which factors influenced visual scoring, strain histograms and strain ratios. Furthermore this study aimed to evaluate the effect of observer experience on visual scorings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two operators examined 20 targets of various stiffness and size (16.7 to 2.5 mm) in an elasticity phantom at a depth of 3.5 cm with a 5-18 MHz transducer. Two pre-settings were used yielding 80 scans. Eight evaluators, four experienced, four inexperienced, performed visual scorings. Cut-offs for semi-quantitative methods were established for prediction of target stiffness. Data was pooled in two categories allowing calculations of sensitivity and specificity. Statistical tests chi-square test and linear regression as relevant.

RESULTS: Strain ratios and strain histograms were superior to visual scorings of both experienced and inexperienced observers (p = 0.025, strain histograms vs. experienced observers, p<0.001, strain histograms vs. inexperienced observers, p = 0.044 strain ratios vs. experienced observers and p = 0.002 strain ratios vs. inexperienced observers). No significant difference in predicting target stiffness between strain ratios and strain histograms (p = 0.83) nor between experienced and inexperienced observers (p = 0.054) was shown when using four categories. When pooling data in two groups (80 kPa/45 kPa vs. 14/8 kPa) the difference between the observers became significant (p<0.001). Target size had a significant influence on strain ratios measurements (p = 0.017) and on visual scorings (p<0.001) but not on the strain histograms(p = 0.358). Observer experience had significant effect on visual scorings(p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION: Strain ratios and strain histograms are superior to visual scoring in assessing target stiffness in a phantom. Target size had a significant impact on strain ratios and visual scoring, but not on strain histograms. Experience influenced visual scorings but the difference between experienced and inexperienced observers was only significant when looking at two classes of target stiffness.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftP L o S One
Vol/bind9
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)e88699
ISSN1932-6203
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2014

ID: 43757092