A SYNTHESIS OF GUIDANCE AVAILABLE FOR ASSESSING METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY AND GRADING OF EVIDENCE FROM QUALITATIVE RESEARCH TO INFORM CLINICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Mandeeo Sekhon , Annette de Thurah, George E Fragoulis, Tanja Stamm, Theodora P.M.Vliet Vlieland, Bente Appel Esbensen, H Lempp, Marios Kouloumas, P Pchelnikova, Thijs Willem Swinnen, C Blunt, R. J. O. Ferreira, L Carmona, E Nikiphorou

Abstract

Background:
Qualitative research is crucial to understand key stakeholders experiences and perspectives of care and health services. However, there is a lack of explicit frameworks and guidelines about how best to use qualitative evidence to formulate clinical recommendations. Part of the problem includes uncertainties about the contributions of qualitative research to the evidence, and the empirical and theoretical basis for appraising and synthesizing qualitative evidence in a standardized manner. In addition, most existing grading systems of qualitative research originates from quantitative research, and there is no clear guidance about how to incorporate qualitative research into the evidence hierarchy
OriginalsprogEngelsk
Publikationsdato2022
StatusUdgivet - 2022
BegivenhedEULAR 2022 - Copenhagen
Varighed: 1 jun. 20224 jun. 2022

Konference

KonferenceEULAR 2022
ByCopenhagen
Periode01/06/202204/06/2022

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'A SYNTHESIS OF GUIDANCE AVAILABLE FOR ASSESSING METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY AND GRADING OF EVIDENCE FROM QUALITATIVE RESEARCH TO INFORM CLINICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater