Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

A randomised clinical trial of take-home laparoscopic training

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment Score is a strong predictor of survival in acute-on-chronic liver failure

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Prevention of parastomal hernia using mesh in patients undergoing rectum extirpation

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Temporal trends in length of stay and readmissions after fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Successful performance of pediatric renography does not require sedation

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  5. Hydrochloric acid prolongs the lifetime of central venous catheters in haematologic patients with bacteraemia

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Decentralized virtual reality mastoidectomy simulation training: a prospective, mixed-methods study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Training Cesarean Section: A Scoping Review

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  3. Using virtual-reality simulation to ensure basic competence in hysteroscopy

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

INTRODUCTION: Simulation-based training in surgery helps trainees master laparoscopic skills, and training at home on mobile box trainers may allow trainees to reach proficiency faster. The aim of this study was to examine the added effects of training at home.

METHODS: Participants were trainees from departments of surgery, gynaecology and urology who were recruited while taking part in a laparoscopic training course. The interven-tion consisted of added access to a mobile box trainer allowing participants to train at home.

RESULTS: During a one-year study period, 36 participants completed the trial. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of days it took to complete the course (86 days versus 89 days, p = 0.89) or in the final test scores of the two groups (493 versus 460, p = 0.07). A sig-nificant difference in the number of training sessions at-tended was found (5.8 versus 2.3, p < 0.001). Participants were able to reliably rate their own performance; the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.86, p < 0.001.

CONCLUSIONS: Trainees who had access to training at home did not pass a test earlier or achieve a higher score at the end of a course than trainees who had no such access. Improved access to training at home allowed for shorter and more frequent sessions; however, testing and mandatory training requirements apparently determine training patterns. Trainees were able to reliably rate their own performance.

FUNDING: Equipment for the study was provided by the Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was exempt from ethical approval according to Danish legislation (H-3-2014-FSP31). The trial protocol was registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov prior to commencing the trial (NCT02243215).

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftDanish Medical Journal
Vol/bind66
Udgave nummer1
ISSN1603-9629
StatusUdgivet - jan. 2019

Bibliografisk note

Articles published in the DMJ are “open access”. This means that the articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

ID: 56927096