Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital

A qualitative study of decision-making on Phase III randomized clinical trial participation in paediatric oncology: Adolescents' and parents' perspectives and preferences

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review


  1. Structure and content of diaries written by close relatives for intensive care unit patients: A narrative approach (DRIP study)

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Intervention fidelity in post-intensive care follow-up consultations at ten sites in the RAPIT-trial: a mixed-methods evaluation

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. The existential experience of everyday life with systemic lupus erythematosus

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Mechanisms and drivers of social inequality in phase II cardiac rehabilitation attendance: A Convergent Mixed Methods study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

AIM: To explore parents' and adolescents' motives for accepting/declining participation in the ALL2008 trials and adolescents' involvement in the decision-making process.

BACKGROUND: Children and adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia treated on the Nordic Society of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology ALL2008 protocol were eligible for two randomizations testing 6-mercaptopurine treatment intensifications to improve efficacy and Asparaginase de-escalation to reduce toxicity. We recently reported that while adolescents favoured treatment reduction, parents of young children favoured treatment intensification.

DESIGN: A qualitative, exploratory study.

METHODS: A maximum variation sampling strategy was used. Five adolescents aged 12-17 years, six parents of adolescents and five parents of children aged 1-12 years were interviewed in the period March-May 2015. Data were analysed using content analysis.

FINDINGS: Adolescents and parents emphasized the importance of adolescents' active participation in decisions regarding enrolment into clinical trials. A majority of adolescents were either final or collaborative decision-makers. Parents stated that in case of disagreement, they would overrule the adolescents' decision. There were no differences between motivations of preferences held by parents of children or adolescents, respectively. Decisions were based on subjective values attributed to cure contra toxicity and individual preferences for either standard or experimental treatment. The possibility of a negative outcome induced fear of decisional regret and distress by the parents, yet they invested considerable trust in the physician's expertise.

CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the importance of adolescents' active involvement in consent conferences. Research on management of disagreements between adolescents and parents in trial decisions is needed.

TidsskriftJournal of Advanced Nursing
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)110-118
Antal sider9
StatusUdgivet - jan. 2018

ID: 52703415