TY - JOUR
T1 - A Program to Improve General Palliative Cancer Care Guideline Implementation
T2 - Development, Acceptability, and Feasibility of Implementation Strategies
AU - Sørensen, Dina Melanie
AU - Egholm, Cecilie Lindström
AU - Dalton, Susanne Oksbjerg
AU - Rosted, Elizabeth
AU - Brodersen, John Brandt
AU - Møller, Mia Linda
AU - Petersen, Mai-Britt Angersbach
AU - Heymann, Annika von
AU - Bidstrup, Pernille
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2025/12
Y1 - 2025/12
N2 - Rationale: Implementing palliative care for patients with cancer in the healthcare sector is a complex task. Some patients with cancer do not receive timely and comprehensive palliative care tailored to their needs, potentially reducing their quality of life. Aims and Objectives: The goal is to develop an Implementation Program to improve the implementation of the national guidelines for general palliative cancer care. Moreover, the study aims to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of the implementation strategies among healthcare professionals. Design: We used a participatory action research approach and the Quality Implementation Framework to guide the program. Additionally, we evaluated the acceptability and feasibility of the implementation strategies through a qualitative descriptive design. Methods: Thirty-one healthcare professionals from oncology, municipalities, and general practice took part in developing the Implementation Program with guidance from a facilitator. We utilized data triangulation, including qualitative interviews (n = 17), observation data from in-person meetings (n = 5), virtual meetings (n = 50), and process data gathered from November 2021 to March 2023. We analyzed the data using Content Analysis methods. Results: A program comprising 14 critical steps was developed. The implementation strategies were found acceptable and feasible, particularly for cross-sectoral networking and a facilitator supporting collaboration. However, Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles were considered problematic. The value of learning from experiences was recognized, and healthcare professionals appreciated the advantages of cross-sector collaboration. Conclusion: This study involved cross-sectoral healthcare professionals in developing the Implementation Program for general palliative cancer care. Networking is vital in this context and should be considered a stand-alone implementation strategy.
AB - Rationale: Implementing palliative care for patients with cancer in the healthcare sector is a complex task. Some patients with cancer do not receive timely and comprehensive palliative care tailored to their needs, potentially reducing their quality of life. Aims and Objectives: The goal is to develop an Implementation Program to improve the implementation of the national guidelines for general palliative cancer care. Moreover, the study aims to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of the implementation strategies among healthcare professionals. Design: We used a participatory action research approach and the Quality Implementation Framework to guide the program. Additionally, we evaluated the acceptability and feasibility of the implementation strategies through a qualitative descriptive design. Methods: Thirty-one healthcare professionals from oncology, municipalities, and general practice took part in developing the Implementation Program with guidance from a facilitator. We utilized data triangulation, including qualitative interviews (n = 17), observation data from in-person meetings (n = 5), virtual meetings (n = 50), and process data gathered from November 2021 to March 2023. We analyzed the data using Content Analysis methods. Results: A program comprising 14 critical steps was developed. The implementation strategies were found acceptable and feasible, particularly for cross-sectoral networking and a facilitator supporting collaboration. However, Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles were considered problematic. The value of learning from experiences was recognized, and healthcare professionals appreciated the advantages of cross-sector collaboration. Conclusion: This study involved cross-sectoral healthcare professionals in developing the Implementation Program for general palliative cancer care. Networking is vital in this context and should be considered a stand-alone implementation strategy.
KW - cancer
KW - cross-sectoral collaboration
KW - implementation research
KW - national guidelines
KW - palliative care
KW - participatory action research
KW - qualitative approaches
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105023782370&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jep.70335
DO - 10.1111/jep.70335
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 41335511
AN - SCOPUS:105023782370
SN - 1356-1294
VL - 31
JO - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
JF - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
IS - 8
M1 - e70335
ER -