Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

A novel in vitro wound biofilm model used to evaluate low-frequency ultrasonic-assisted wound debridement

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Harvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{50f8360a8432476aab35524cd468a421,
title = "A novel in vitro wound biofilm model used to evaluate low-frequency ultrasonic-assisted wound debridement",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: Bacterial biofilms remain difficult to treat. The biofilm mode of growth enables bacteria to survive antibiotic treatment and the inflammatory reaction. Low-frequency ultrasound has recently been shown to improve healing in a variety of settings. It is hypothesised that ultrasound disrupts the biofilm leaving bacteria more vulnerable to antiseptic or antibiotic treatment. The objective of this study is to develop a realistic model to elucidate the effect of ultrasound on biofilms.METHOD: A novel in vitro wound biofilm model was developed. Biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus were casted in a semi-solid agar gel composed of either tryptic soy broth (TSB) or a wound simulating media (WSM; composed of Bolton broth with blood and plasma), to resemble the non-surface attached aggregates. The model was used to evaluate the antibiofilm effect of an ultrasonic-assisted wound debridement device (UAW) in the presence of saline irrigation and treatment with a polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB)-containing antiseptic. Confocal microscopy was used to evaluate the effect of treatments on biofilm disruption and cell viability counting measured the antibacterial effects.RESULTS: Confocal microscopy showed that application of 10 seconds of moderate-intensity UAW could effectively disrupt semi-solid biofilms grown on both media settings. This treatment only had a small effect on the cell viability. A 24-hour treatment with PHMB was able to reduce the number of bacteria but not eradicate the biofilm in both media settings. Interestingly, the efficacy of the PHMB antiseptic was significantly higher when applied on biofilms grown in the more complex WSM media. However, we found a significant improvement in reducing the number of viable bacteria grown on both media when applying UAW before administration of the PHMB solution. Applying UAW in the presence of PHMB further improved the efficacy.CONCLUSION: Using a realistic in vitro biofilm wound model, we show combining UAW with a PHMB-containing antiseptic has potential as an antibiofilm strategy in wound care.DECLARATION OF INTEREST: The manufacturer of the ultrasonic-assisted wound debridement device, S{\"o}ring GmbH, Germany, has supported the ultrasound studies. The funding company had no role in the design, data collection, analysis, review, or approval of the manuscript.",
keywords = "Biofilms, Debridement, Humans, In Vitro Techniques, Models, Biological, Staphylococcus aureus, Treatment Outcome, Ultrasonics, Wound Infection",
author = "S Crone and C Garde and T Bjarnsholt and M Alhede",
year = "2015",
month = "2",
doi = "10.12968/jowc.2015.24.2.64",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "64, 66--9, 72",
journal = "Journal of wound care",
issn = "0969-0700",
publisher = "Mark/Allen Publishing Ltd",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A novel in vitro wound biofilm model used to evaluate low-frequency ultrasonic-assisted wound debridement

AU - Crone, S

AU - Garde, C

AU - Bjarnsholt, T

AU - Alhede, M

PY - 2015/2

Y1 - 2015/2

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Bacterial biofilms remain difficult to treat. The biofilm mode of growth enables bacteria to survive antibiotic treatment and the inflammatory reaction. Low-frequency ultrasound has recently been shown to improve healing in a variety of settings. It is hypothesised that ultrasound disrupts the biofilm leaving bacteria more vulnerable to antiseptic or antibiotic treatment. The objective of this study is to develop a realistic model to elucidate the effect of ultrasound on biofilms.METHOD: A novel in vitro wound biofilm model was developed. Biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus were casted in a semi-solid agar gel composed of either tryptic soy broth (TSB) or a wound simulating media (WSM; composed of Bolton broth with blood and plasma), to resemble the non-surface attached aggregates. The model was used to evaluate the antibiofilm effect of an ultrasonic-assisted wound debridement device (UAW) in the presence of saline irrigation and treatment with a polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB)-containing antiseptic. Confocal microscopy was used to evaluate the effect of treatments on biofilm disruption and cell viability counting measured the antibacterial effects.RESULTS: Confocal microscopy showed that application of 10 seconds of moderate-intensity UAW could effectively disrupt semi-solid biofilms grown on both media settings. This treatment only had a small effect on the cell viability. A 24-hour treatment with PHMB was able to reduce the number of bacteria but not eradicate the biofilm in both media settings. Interestingly, the efficacy of the PHMB antiseptic was significantly higher when applied on biofilms grown in the more complex WSM media. However, we found a significant improvement in reducing the number of viable bacteria grown on both media when applying UAW before administration of the PHMB solution. Applying UAW in the presence of PHMB further improved the efficacy.CONCLUSION: Using a realistic in vitro biofilm wound model, we show combining UAW with a PHMB-containing antiseptic has potential as an antibiofilm strategy in wound care.DECLARATION OF INTEREST: The manufacturer of the ultrasonic-assisted wound debridement device, Söring GmbH, Germany, has supported the ultrasound studies. The funding company had no role in the design, data collection, analysis, review, or approval of the manuscript.

AB - OBJECTIVE: Bacterial biofilms remain difficult to treat. The biofilm mode of growth enables bacteria to survive antibiotic treatment and the inflammatory reaction. Low-frequency ultrasound has recently been shown to improve healing in a variety of settings. It is hypothesised that ultrasound disrupts the biofilm leaving bacteria more vulnerable to antiseptic or antibiotic treatment. The objective of this study is to develop a realistic model to elucidate the effect of ultrasound on biofilms.METHOD: A novel in vitro wound biofilm model was developed. Biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus were casted in a semi-solid agar gel composed of either tryptic soy broth (TSB) or a wound simulating media (WSM; composed of Bolton broth with blood and plasma), to resemble the non-surface attached aggregates. The model was used to evaluate the antibiofilm effect of an ultrasonic-assisted wound debridement device (UAW) in the presence of saline irrigation and treatment with a polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB)-containing antiseptic. Confocal microscopy was used to evaluate the effect of treatments on biofilm disruption and cell viability counting measured the antibacterial effects.RESULTS: Confocal microscopy showed that application of 10 seconds of moderate-intensity UAW could effectively disrupt semi-solid biofilms grown on both media settings. This treatment only had a small effect on the cell viability. A 24-hour treatment with PHMB was able to reduce the number of bacteria but not eradicate the biofilm in both media settings. Interestingly, the efficacy of the PHMB antiseptic was significantly higher when applied on biofilms grown in the more complex WSM media. However, we found a significant improvement in reducing the number of viable bacteria grown on both media when applying UAW before administration of the PHMB solution. Applying UAW in the presence of PHMB further improved the efficacy.CONCLUSION: Using a realistic in vitro biofilm wound model, we show combining UAW with a PHMB-containing antiseptic has potential as an antibiofilm strategy in wound care.DECLARATION OF INTEREST: The manufacturer of the ultrasonic-assisted wound debridement device, Söring GmbH, Germany, has supported the ultrasound studies. The funding company had no role in the design, data collection, analysis, review, or approval of the manuscript.

KW - Biofilms

KW - Debridement

KW - Humans

KW - In Vitro Techniques

KW - Models, Biological

KW - Staphylococcus aureus

KW - Treatment Outcome

KW - Ultrasonics

KW - Wound Infection

U2 - 10.12968/jowc.2015.24.2.64

DO - 10.12968/jowc.2015.24.2.64

M3 - Journal article

VL - 24

SP - 64, 66-9, 72

JO - Journal of wound care

JF - Journal of wound care

SN - 0969-0700

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 46283786