Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

A discussion of differences in preparation, performance and postreflections in participant observations within two grounded theory approaches

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Patient and spouses experiences with transition from intensive care unit to hospital ward - qualitative study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Accessibility, utilisation and acceptability of a county-based home care service for sick children in Sweden

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. How to achieve a collaborative approach in health promotion: preferences and ideas of users of mental health services

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Mothers' informational needs when deciding to have their newborn infant vaccinated with BCG. A Mixed-methods design

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Flere sygeplejersker vil øge patientsikkerheden og behandlingskvaliteten

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelFormidling

  2. What relatives of older medical patients want us to know - a mixed-methods study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer
This paper presents a discussion of the differences in using participant observation as a data collection method by comparing the classic grounded theory methodology of Barney Glaser with the constructivist grounded theory methodology by Kathy Charmaz. Participant observations allow nursing researchers to experience activities and interactions directly in situ. However, using participant observations as a data collection method can be done in many ways, depending on the chosen grounded theory methodology, and may produce different results. This discussion shows that how the differences between using participant observations in classic and constructivist grounded theory can be considerable and that grounded theory researchers should adhere to the method descriptions of performing participant observations according to the selected grounded theory methodology to enhance the quality of research.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftScandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences
Vol/bind31
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)413-420
ISSN0283-9318
DOI
StatusUdgivet - jun. 2017

ID: 49803395