Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

A Description of Deaths Following Emergency Abdominal Surgery

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Anastomotic Leakage After Stoma Reversal Combined with Incisional Hernia Repair

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor (suPAR) as an Added Predictor to Existing Preoperative Risk Assessments

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Consensus on Training and Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A Delphi Study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Dødeligheden efter akut laparotomi kan reduceres

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Rebound pain following peripheral nerve block anaesthesia in acute ankle fracture surgery: An exploratory pilot study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Interventions for preventing intensive care unit delirium in adults

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  4. Perioperative alcohol cessation intervention for postoperative complications

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer
OBJECTIVE:

Emergency major abdominal surgery carries a high mortality rate. The aim of this present study was to characterize a population of deceased abdominal surgical patients, to examine how many died unexpectedly and how many were subject to treatment limitations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

We included adult emergency abdominal surgical patients who died within 30 days postoperatively. We collected data from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2014, in a Danish tertiary care hospital (Herlev).

RESULTS:

A total of 138 patients were included which corresponded to a crude mortality rate of 16.5% in the population. Four percent (5 of 138) of the patients died unexpectedly without any prior signs of deterioration and 46% (65 of 138) experienced a complicated treatment course, 67% of which was treated in the intensive care unit (ICU). The remaining 50% (68 of 138) had treatment limitations, applied pre- or postoperatively, of which 4% were treated in the ICU ward.

CONCLUSIONS:

In the present study, we found a high number of patients with treatment limitations, offering one explanation to why so relatively few high-risk surgical patients are admitted to the ICU ward. Whether intermediary wards could serve as a viable alternative for these patients, securing a sufficient level of treatment without taking up scarce beds in the intensive care unit, remains an important question for future studies. Furthermore, five patients died unexpectedly, without any clear cause of death, proving that continual strides toward improving the overall process of postoperative care are still demanded.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftWorld Journal of Surgery
Vol/bind41
Udgave nummer12
Sider (fra-til)3105-3110
Antal sider6
ISSN0364-2313
DOI
StatusUdgivet - dec. 2017

ID: 52682485