TY - JOUR
T1 - A Danish perspective on the use of wearables for digital monitoring
AU - Andersen, Mads Ørbæk
AU - Kunkel, Joakim Bo
AU - Dominquez, Helena
AU - Lamberts, Morten Kjøbek
AU - Hadziselimovic, Edina
AU - Myhlendorph, Anne Blaabjerg
AU - Osbak, Philip Samuel
AU - Graversen, Peter Laursen
N1 - Published under Open Access CC-BY-NC-BD 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
PY - 2026/3/19
Y1 - 2026/3/19
N2 - INTRODUCTION: Tension band wiring (TBW) is one of the most commonly used methods of fixation for displaced olecranon fractures. This study aimed to assess whether implant positioning (IMPO) of TBW for olecranon fractures was associated with complications.METHODS: This was a multicentre cohort study. Eligible patients were retrieved from the hospitals' administrative databases using diagnosis codes for elbow and olecranon fractures. The patients' healthcare files were reviewed for demographics and complications. A major complication was defined as any reoperation within eight weeks or deep infection. Any loss of fixation was added to define surgical complications. Preoperative X-rays were classified according to the Mayo classification. Post-operative X-rays were evaluated, and the IMPO of TBW was rated on a 0-10 scale, yielding 10 points if all conditions were met. A high IMPO score was 9-10 points, a low score was eight points or less.RESULTS: A total of 307 patients were included: 76% with Mayo type 2A and 20% with type 2B. The TBWs were rated with a median score of eight points (range: 3-10), and 11.8% had major complications. There was a 5% complication rate with a high IMPO score, compared with 15% with a low score (p = 0.010). A total of 105 patients (34%) had surgical complications: 21% with a high IMPO score and 44% with a low IMPO score.CONCLUSIONS: The IMPO score after TBW for olecranon fractures has a clear correlation with post-operative complications. We propose that at least nine out of ten points should be achieved before surgery is acceptable.FUNDING: None.TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not relevant.
AB - INTRODUCTION: Tension band wiring (TBW) is one of the most commonly used methods of fixation for displaced olecranon fractures. This study aimed to assess whether implant positioning (IMPO) of TBW for olecranon fractures was associated with complications.METHODS: This was a multicentre cohort study. Eligible patients were retrieved from the hospitals' administrative databases using diagnosis codes for elbow and olecranon fractures. The patients' healthcare files were reviewed for demographics and complications. A major complication was defined as any reoperation within eight weeks or deep infection. Any loss of fixation was added to define surgical complications. Preoperative X-rays were classified according to the Mayo classification. Post-operative X-rays were evaluated, and the IMPO of TBW was rated on a 0-10 scale, yielding 10 points if all conditions were met. A high IMPO score was 9-10 points, a low score was eight points or less.RESULTS: A total of 307 patients were included: 76% with Mayo type 2A and 20% with type 2B. The TBWs were rated with a median score of eight points (range: 3-10), and 11.8% had major complications. There was a 5% complication rate with a high IMPO score, compared with 15% with a low score (p = 0.010). A total of 105 patients (34%) had surgical complications: 21% with a high IMPO score and 44% with a low IMPO score.CONCLUSIONS: The IMPO score after TBW for olecranon fractures has a clear correlation with post-operative complications. We propose that at least nine out of ten points should be achieved before surgery is acceptable.FUNDING: None.TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not relevant.
KW - Humans
KW - Female
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Aged
KW - Olecranon Process/injuries
KW - Denmark
KW - Ulna Fractures/surgery
KW - Postoperative Complications/epidemiology
KW - Adult
KW - Bone Wires/adverse effects
KW - Wearable Electronic Devices
KW - Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods
KW - Reoperation/statistics & numerical data
KW - Aged, 80 and over
KW - Cohort Studies
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105034398561
U2 - 10.61409/A06250536
DO - 10.61409/A06250536
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 41978452
SN - 0907-8916
VL - 73
JO - Danish Medical Bulletin
JF - Danish Medical Bulletin
IS - 4
M1 - A06250536
ER -