@article{5efd32b3df9b41318329871cb70e6d25,
title = "A comparison of single-lead atrial pacing with dual-chamber pacing in sick sinus syndrome",
abstract = "In patients with sick sinus syndrome, bradycardia can be treated with a single-lead pacemaker or a dual-chamber pacemaker. Previous trials have revealed that pacing modes preserving atrio-ventricular synchrony are superior to single-lead ventricular pacing, but it remains unclear if there is any difference between single-lead atrial pacing (AAIR) and dual-chamber pacing (DDDR).",
keywords = "Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Atrial Fibrillation, Cardiac Pacing, Artificial, Cardiotonic Agents, Cause of Death, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pacemaker, Artificial, Reoperation, Sick Sinus Syndrome, Stroke, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult",
author = "Nielsen, {Jens Cosedis} and Thomsen, {Poul Erik B} and S{\o}ren H{\o}jberg and Mogens M{\o}ller and Thomas Vesterlund and Dorthe Dalsgaard and Leif Mortensen and Tonny Nielsen and Mogens Asklund and Friis, {Elsebeth V} and Per Christensen and Simonsen, {Erik H} and Eriksen, {Ulrik H} and Gunnar Jensen and Svendsen, {Jesper H} and Toff, {William D} and Healey, {Jeffrey S} and Henning Andersen and {DANPACE Investigators}",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1093/eurheartj/ehr022",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "686--96",
journal = "European Heart Journal",
issn = "0195-668X",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "6",
}