Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

A case of standardization? Implementing health promotion guidelines in Denmark

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Perceptions of public health and cross-sectoral collaboration in low SES neighbourhoods in Denmark

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Children as visionary change agents in Danish school health promotion

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Danish 'add-in' school-based health promotion: integrating health in curriculum time

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Health promotion in Danish schools: Local priorities, policies and practices

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  5. Integrating research evidence and physical activity policy making-REPOPA project

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. School factors and student drinking in high schools: a cross-sectional study of school policies and party regulation

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Overvægt er ikke 'det nye tobak'

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftBidrag til avis - Kommentar/debatFormidling

  3. Rygeforebyggelse handler ikke (kun) om sundhed og økonomi

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftBidrag til avis - Kommentar/debatFormidling

Vis graf over relationer

Guidelines are increasingly used in an effort to standardize and systematize health practices at the local level and to promote evidence-based practice. The implementation of guidelines frequently faces problems, however, and standardization processes may in general have other outcomes than the ones envisioned by the makers of standards. In 2012, the Danish National Health Authorities introduced a set of health promotion guidelines that were meant to guide the decision making and priority setting of Denmark's 98 local governments. The guidelines provided recommendations for health promotion policies and interventions and were structured according to risk factors such as alcohol, smoking and physical activity. This article examines the process of implementation of the new Danish health promotion guidelines. The article is based on qualitative interviews and participant observation, focusing on the professional practices of health promotion officers in four local governments as well as the field of Danish health promotion more generally. The analysis highlights practices and episodes related to the implementation of the guidelines and takes inspiration from Timmermans and Epstein's sociology of standards and standardization. It remains an open question whether or not the guidelines lead to more standardized policies and interventions, but we suggest that the guidelines promote a risk factor-oriented approach as the dominant frame for knowledge, reasoning, decision making and priority setting in health promotion. We describe this process as a case of epistemic standardization.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftHealth Promotion International
Vol/bind31
Udgave nummer3
Sider (fra-til)692-703
Antal sider12
ISSN0957-4824
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 1 sep. 2016
Eksternt udgivetJa

ID: 57282754