Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prognostic significance of histologic grade on survival of ovarian serous cancer in Denmark during nearly 30 years.
METHODS: Using the nationwide Danish Pathology Data Bank, we evaluated 4317 women with ovarian serous carcinoma in 1978-2006. All pathology reports were scrutinized and tumors classified as either low-grade serous carcinomas (LGSC) or high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSC). Tumors in which the original pathology reports were described as well-differentiated were classified as LGSC, and those that were described as moderately or poorly differentiated were classified as HGSC. We obtained histologic slides from the pathology departments for women with a diagnosis of well-differentiated serous carcinoma during 1997-2006, which were then reviewed by expert gynecologic pathologists. Data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis with follow-up through June 2009.
RESULTS: Women with HGSC had a significantly increased risk of dying (HR=1.9; 95% CI: 1.6-2.3) compared with women with LGSC while adjusting for age and stage. Expert review of 171 women originally classified as well-differentiated in 1997-2006 were interpreted as LGSC in 30% of cases, whereas 12% were interpreted as HGSC and 50% as serous borderline ovarian tumors (SBT). Compared with women with confirmed LGSC, women with SBT at review had a significantly lower risk of dying (HR=0.5; 95% CI: 0.22-0.99), and women with HGSC at review had a non-significantly increased risk of dying (HR=1.6; 95% CI: 0.7-3.4).
CONCLUSIONS: A binary grading system is a significant predictor of survival for ovarian serous carcinoma.
Originalsprog | Engelsk |
---|---|
Tidsskrift | Gynecologic Oncology |
Vol/bind | 125 |
Udgave nummer | 3 |
Sider (fra-til) | 655-60 |
Antal sider | 6 |
ISSN | 0090-8258 |
DOI | |
Status | Udgivet - jun. 2012 |
Udgivet eksternt | Ja |