TY - JOUR
T1 - 2020 Update of the quality indicators for acute myocardial infarction
T2 - a position paper of the Association for Acute Cardiovascular Care: the study group for quality indicators from the ACVC and the NSTE-ACS guideline group
AU - Schiele, François
AU - Aktaa, Suleman
AU - Rossello, Xavier
AU - Ahrens, Ingo
AU - Claeys, Marc J
AU - Collet, Jean-Philippe
AU - Fox, Keith A A
AU - Gale, Chris P
AU - Huber, Kurt
AU - Iakobishvili, Zaza
AU - Keys, Alan
AU - Lambrinou, Ekaterini
AU - Leonardi, Sergio
AU - Lettino, Maddalena
AU - Masoudi, Frederick A
AU - Price, Susanna
AU - Quinn, Tom
AU - Swahn, Eva
AU - Thiele, Holger
AU - Timmis, Adam
AU - Tubaro, Marco
AU - Vrints, Christiaan J M
AU - Walker, David
AU - Bueno, Hector
AU - Halvorsen, Sigrun
AU - Jernberg, Tomas
AU - Jortveit, Jarle
AU - Blöndal, Mai
AU - Ibanez, Borja
AU - Hassager, Christian
AU - ESC Scientific Document Group
N1 - Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2021. For permissions, please email: [email protected].
PY - 2021/2
Y1 - 2021/2
N2 - AIMS: Quality indicators (QIs) are tools to improve the delivery of evidence-base medicine. In 2017, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Association for Acute Cardiovascular Care (ACVC) developed a set of QIs for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), which have been evaluated at national and international levels and across different populations. However, an update of these QIs is needed in light of the accumulated experience and the changes in the supporting evidence.METHODS AND RESULTS: The ESC methodology for the QI development was used to update the 2017 ACVC QIs. We identified key domains of AMI care, conducted a literature review, developed a list of candidate QIs, and used a modified Delphi method to select the final set of indicators. The same seven domains of AMI care identified by the 2017 Study Group were retained for this update. For each domain, main and secondary QIs were developed reflecting the essential and complementary aspects of care, respectively. Overall, 26 QIs are proposed in this document, compared to 20 in the 2017 set. New QIs are proposed in this document (e.g. the centre use of high-sensitivity troponin), some were retained or modified (e.g. the in-hospital risk assessment), and others were retired in accordance with the changes in evidence [e.g. the proportion of patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) treated with fondaparinux] and the feasibility assessments (e.g. the proportion of patients with NSTEMI whom risk assessment is performed using the GRACE and CRUSADE risk scores).CONCLUSION: Updated QIs for the management of AMI were developed according to contemporary knowledge and accumulated experience. These QIs may be applied to evaluate and improve the quality of AMI care.
AB - AIMS: Quality indicators (QIs) are tools to improve the delivery of evidence-base medicine. In 2017, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Association for Acute Cardiovascular Care (ACVC) developed a set of QIs for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), which have been evaluated at national and international levels and across different populations. However, an update of these QIs is needed in light of the accumulated experience and the changes in the supporting evidence.METHODS AND RESULTS: The ESC methodology for the QI development was used to update the 2017 ACVC QIs. We identified key domains of AMI care, conducted a literature review, developed a list of candidate QIs, and used a modified Delphi method to select the final set of indicators. The same seven domains of AMI care identified by the 2017 Study Group were retained for this update. For each domain, main and secondary QIs were developed reflecting the essential and complementary aspects of care, respectively. Overall, 26 QIs are proposed in this document, compared to 20 in the 2017 set. New QIs are proposed in this document (e.g. the centre use of high-sensitivity troponin), some were retained or modified (e.g. the in-hospital risk assessment), and others were retired in accordance with the changes in evidence [e.g. the proportion of patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) treated with fondaparinux] and the feasibility assessments (e.g. the proportion of patients with NSTEMI whom risk assessment is performed using the GRACE and CRUSADE risk scores).CONCLUSION: Updated QIs for the management of AMI were developed according to contemporary knowledge and accumulated experience. These QIs may be applied to evaluate and improve the quality of AMI care.
KW - Humans
KW - Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis
KW - Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction
KW - Quality Indicators, Health Care
KW - Risk Assessment
KW - ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
KW - Myocardial infarction
KW - Quality improvement
KW - Quality indicators
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85108609650&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/ehjacc/zuaa037
DO - 10.1093/ehjacc/zuaa037
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 33550362
SN - 2048-8726
VL - 10
SP - 224
EP - 233
JO - European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care
JF - European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care
IS - 2
ER -