Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

12-year survival analysis of 322 Hintegra total ankle arthroplasties from an independent center

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Why are patients still in hospital after fast-track, unilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Minimal important change values for the Oxford Knee Score and the Forgotten Joint Score at 1 year after total knee replacement

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. High risk for revision after shoulder arthroplasty for failed osteosynthesis of proximal humeral fractures

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Acetabular cup position and risk of dislocation in primary total hip arthroplasty

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

Background and purpose - Total ankle arthroplasties (TAAs) have larger revision rates than hip and knee implants. We examined the survival rates of our primary TAAs, and what different factors, including the cause of arthritis, affect the success and/or revision rate.Patients and methods - From 2004 to 2016, 322 primary Hintegra TAAs were implanted: the 2nd generation implant from 2004 until mid-2007 and the 3rd generation from late 2007 to 2016. A Cox proportional hazards model evaluated sex, age, primary diagnosis, and implant generation, pre- and postoperative angles and implant position as risk factors for revision.Results - 60 implants (19%) were revised, the majority (n = 34) due to loosening. The 5-year survival rate (95% CI) was 75% (69-82) and the 10-year survival rate was 68% (60-77). There was a reduced risk of revision, per degree of increased postoperative medial distal tibial angle at 0.84 (0.72-0.98) and preoperative talus angle at 0.95 (0.90-1.00), indicating that varus ankles may have a larger revision rate. Generation of implant, sex, primary diagnosis, and most pre- and postoperative radiological angles did not statistically affect revision risk.Interpretation - Our revision rates are slightly above registry rates and well above those of the developer. Most were revised due to loosening; no difference was demonstrated with the 2 generations of implant used. Learning curve and a low threshold for revision could explain the high revision rate.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftActa Orthopaedica (Online)
Vol/bind91
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)444-449
Antal sider6
ISSN1745-3682
DOI
StatusUdgivet - aug. 2020

ID: 59663016