Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
Bispebjerg Hospital - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

UTE T2* mapping of tendinopathic patellar tendons: an MRI reproducibility study

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Tattoo complications and magnetic resonance imaging: a comprehensive review of the literature

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  2. Grading lumbar disc degeneration: a comparison between low- and high-field MRI

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Arterial spin labeling: a technical overview

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  1. Collagens in primary frozen shoulder: expression of collagen mRNA isoforms in the different phases of the disease

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. The influence of an orthopaedic walker boot on forefoot force

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Ultrasound-based speckle-tracking in tendons: a critical analysis for the technician and the clinician

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

Background: There is currently a lack of imaging modalities that can be used as a sensitive measure in tendinopathy. Recent findings suggest the applicability of ultra-short echo time (UTE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) T2* mapping in tendons, but the reproducibility remains unknown. Purpose: To evaluate test–retest reproducibility of UTE MRI T2* mapping of tendinopathic patellar tendons and to evaluate the intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of the measurement. Material and Methods: Fifteen patients with chronic patellar tendinopathy were evaluated with UTE MRI twice in a 3.0-T scanner on the same day. Manual segmentation of the patellar tendon was performed by two blinded investigators and automated T2*map reconstruction was performed in custom-made software. Results: There was a significant and numerically small difference in test–retest T2* values (T2*mean diff = 0.06 ± 0.07 ms ≈ 3.7%; P = 0.006) with an ICC = 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58–0.98; typical error of 3.0%). The intra- and inter-observer reproducibility showed no significant bias (P = 0.493 and P = 0.052), and generally substantial reproducibility was demonstrated for T2* (intra-observer ICC = 0.99; 95% CI 0.98–1.00 and inter-observer ICC = 0.99; 95% CI 0.96–1.00, and typical error 1.3% and 1.3%, respectively). Conclusion: These data demonstrate a small bias between repeated measurements for UTE T2*, but with a very low associated mean difference (3.7%) between the two tests. The high ICC values and low typical error % demonstrate reproducibility of repeated T2*-mapping sessions. Further, the method showed substantial intra- and inter-observer reproducibility for T2* values proving feasibility for use of UTE T2* mapping in research and clinical practice.

Original languageEnglish
JournalActa Radiologica
Volume62
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)215-224
Number of pages10
ISSN0284-1851
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2021

    Research areas

  • Patellar tendon, T2* mapping, reproducibility, tendinopathy, ultra-short echo time imaging

ID: 61626606