Print page Print page
Switch language
Bispebjerg Hospital - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital

Type and timing of menopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer risk: individual participant meta-analysis of the worldwide epidemiological evidence

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Drug-coated balloons: room for development of BASKET-SMALL 2

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Oxygenation targets in acutely ill patients: still a matter of debate

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Taking no for an answer. Nurses' consultations with people with cardiac disease about rehabilitation: A qualitative study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Alcohol consumption, cardiac biomarkers, and risk of atrial fibrillation and adverse outcomes

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Heterogeneous contributions of change in population distribution of body mass index to change in obesity and underweight

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Trans-ethnic gut microbial signatures of prediabetic subjects from India and Denmark

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  5. Trans-ethnic gut microbiota signatures of type 2 diabetes in Denmark and India

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: Published findings on breast cancer risk associated with different types of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) are inconsistent, with limited information on long-term effects. We bring together the epidemiological evidence, published and unpublished, on these associations, and review the relevant randomised evidence.

METHODS: Principal analyses used individual participant data from all eligible prospective studies that had sought information on the type and timing of MHT use; the main analyses are of individuals with complete information on this. Studies were identified by searching many formal and informal sources regularly from Jan 1, 1992, to Jan 1, 2018. Current users were included up to 5 years (mean 1·4 years) after last-reported MHT use. Logistic regression yielded adjusted risk ratios (RRs) comparing particular groups of MHT users versus never users.

FINDINGS: During prospective follow-up, 108 647 postmenopausal women developed breast cancer at mean age 65 years (SD 7); 55 575 (51%) had used MHT. Among women with complete information, mean MHT duration was 10 years (SD 6) in current users and 7 years (SD 6) in past users, and mean age was 50 years (SD 5) at menopause and 50 years (SD 6) at starting MHT. Every MHT type, except vaginal oestrogens, was associated with excess breast cancer risks, which increased steadily with duration of use and were greater for oestrogen-progestagen than oestrogen-only preparations. Among current users, these excess risks were definite even during years 1-4 (oestrogen-progestagen RR 1·60, 95% CI 1·52-1·69; oestrogen-only RR 1·17, 1·10-1·26), and were twice as great during years 5-14 (oestrogen-progestagen RR 2·08, 2·02-2·15; oestrogen-only RR 1·33, 1·28-1·37). The oestrogen-progestagen risks during years 5-14 were greater with daily than with less frequent progestagen use (RR 2·30, 2·21-2·40 vs 1·93, 1·84-2·01; heterogeneity p<0·0001). For a given preparation, the RRs during years 5-14 of current use were much greater for oestrogen-receptor-positive tumours than for oestrogen-receptor-negative tumours, were similar for women starting MHT at ages 40-44, 45-49, 50-54, and 55-59 years, and were attenuated by starting after age 60 years or by adiposity (with little risk from oestrogen-only MHT in women who were obese). After ceasing MHT, some excess risk persisted for more than 10 years; its magnitude depended on the duration of previous use, with little excess following less than 1 year of MHT use.

INTERPRETATION: If these associations are largely causal, then for women of average weight in developed countries, 5 years of MHT, starting at age 50 years, would increase breast cancer incidence at ages 50-69 years by about one in every 50 users of oestrogen plus daily progestagen preparations; one in every 70 users of oestrogen plus intermittent progestagen preparations; and one in every 200 users of oestrogen-only preparations. The corresponding excesses from 10 years of MHT would be about twice as great.

FUNDING: Cancer Research UK and the Medical Research Council.

Original languageEnglish
Issue number10204
Pages (from-to)1159-1168
Number of pages10
Publication statusPublished - 28 Sep 2019

    Research areas

  • Adult, Aged, Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology, Drug Therapy, Combination, Estrogen Replacement Therapy, Estrogens/therapeutic use, Female, Humans, Logistic Models, Middle Aged, Obesity/epidemiology, Principal Component Analysis, Progesterone/therapeutic use, Progestins/therapeutic use, Risk, Risk Factors, Time Factors

ID: 58928275