Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
Bispebjerg Hospital - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Prediction of difficult mask ventilation using a systematic assessment of risk factors vs. existing practice - a cluster randomised clinical trial in 94,006 patients

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. SARS-CoV-2 infection and venous thromboembolism after surgery: an international prospective cohort study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Timing of surgery following SARS-CoV-2 infection: an international prospective cohort study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Low compliance with a validated system for emergency department triage

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Nurse-administered early warning score system can be used for emergency department triage

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Quality of care using a multidisciplinary team in the emergency room

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Perisciatic infusion of ropivacaine and analgesia after hallux valgus repair

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • Anders Kehlet Nørskov
  • J Wetterslev
  • C V Rosenstock
  • A Afshari
  • G Astrup
  • J C Jakobsen
  • J L Thomsen
  • Lars Hyldborg Lundstrøm
  • Collaborators (Bent Gymoese Jørgensen, Rikke Maaløe, Birgitte Marie Bonne Schousboe, Anee Vedel members)
  • Bent Gymoese Jørgensen (Member of study group)
  • Rikke Maaløe (Member of study group)
  • Birgitte Marie Bonne Schousboe (Member of study group)
  • Anne Grønborg Vedel (Member of study group)
View graph of relations

We compared implementation of systematic airway assessment with existing practice of airway assessment on prediction of difficult mask ventilation. Twenty-six departments were cluster-randomised to assess eleven risk factors for difficult airway management (intervention) or to continue with their existing airway assessment (control). In both groups, patients predicted as a difficult mask ventilation and/or difficult intubation were registered in the Danish Anaesthesia Database, with a notational summary of airway management. The trial's primary outcome was the respective incidence of unpredicted difficult and easy mask ventilation in the two groups. Among 94,006 patients undergoing mask ventilation, the incidence of unpredicted difficult mask ventilation in the intervention group was 0.91% and 0.88% in the control group; (OR) 0.98 (95% CI 0.66-1.44), p = 0.90. The incidence of patients predicted difficult to mask ventilate, but in fact found to be easy ('falsely predicted difficult') was 0.64% vs. 0.35% (intervention vs. control); OR 1.56 (1.01-2.42), p = 0.045. In the intervention group, 86.3% of all difficult mask ventilations were not predicted, compared with a higher proportion 91.2% in the control group, OR 0.61 (0.41-0.91), p = 0.016. The systematic intervention did not alter the overall incidence of unpredicted difficult mask ventilations, but of the patients who were found to be difficult to mask ventilate, the proportion predicted was higher in the intervention group than in the control group. However, this was at a 'cost' of increasing the number of mask ventilations falsely predicted to be difficult.

Original languageEnglish
JournalAnaesthesia
Volume72
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)296-308
ISSN0003-2409
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

ID: 49253981