Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
Bispebjerg Hospital - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Comparative Effectiveness of Low-Volume Time-Efficient Resistance Training Versus Endurance Training in Patients With Heart Failure

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

  1. Cardiac Rehabilitation After Heart Valve Surgery: IMPROVEMENT IN EXERCISE CAPACITY AND MORBIDITY

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

  2. When the Topic Turns to Sex: CASE SCENARIOS IN SEXUAL COUNSELING AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

  1. Updated EORTC QLQ-C30 general population norm data for Germany

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

  2. The EORTC CAT Core-The computer adaptive version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

  3. The use of EORTC measures in daily clinical practice-A synopsis of a newly developed manual

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

  • Gregers Winding Munch
  • Jaya Birgitte Rosenmeier
  • Morten Petersen
  • Anders Rasmussen Rinnov
  • Ulrik Winning Iepsen
  • Bente Klarlund Pedersen
  • Stefan Peter Mortensen
View graph of relations

PURPOSE: Cardiorespiratory fitness is positively related to heart failure (HF) prognosis, but lack of time and low energy are barriers for adherence to exercise. We, therefore, compared the effect of low-volume time-based resistance exercise training (TRE) with aerobic moderate-intensity cycling (AMC) on maximal and submaximal exercise capacity, health-related quality of life, and vascular function.

METHODS: Twenty-eight HF patients (New York Heart Association class I-II) performed AMC (n = 14) or TRE (n = 14). Maximal and submaximal exercise capacity, health-related quality of life, and vascular function were evaluated before and after a 6-wk training intervention with 3 training sessions per week. The AMC group and the TRE group trained for 45 and 25 min per training session, respectively. During the training sessions, the TRE and AMC groups trained at 60 ± 4% and 59 ± 2% (mean ± standard deviation) of (Equation is included in full-text article.)O2peak, respectively.

RESULTS: The energy expenditure was significantly greater in AMC than in TRE (P < .05). The (Equation is included in full-text article.)O2peak and Wattpeak increased in AMC group (P < .001) and TRE group (P = .001), with no differences between groups. Six-minute walk distance also increased in both groups (AMC, P = .006 and TRE, P = .036), with no difference between groups. Health-related quality of life improved equally in the 2 groups, whereas vascular function did not change in either group.

CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that AMC and TRE equally improved exercise capacity and health-related quality of life in lower New York Heart Association-stage HF patients, despite less time required as well as lower energy expenditure during TRE than during AMC. Therefore, TRE might represent a time-efficient exercise modality for improving adherence to exercise in patients with class I-II HF.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention
Volume38
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)175-181
Number of pages7
ISSN1932-7501
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2018

ID: 56347141