Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
Bispebjerg Hospital - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Cancer caregiving tasks and consequences and their associations with caregiver status and the caregiver's relationship to the patient: a survey

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Documents

DOI

  1. Minimally important differences for the EORTC QLQ-C30 in prostate cancer clinical trials

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Broadening risk profile in familial colorectal cancer type X; increased risk for five cancer types in the national Danish cohort

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Early specialised palliative care: interventions, symptoms, problems

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Investigating the response scale of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in German cancer patients and a population survey

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Minimally important differences for the EORTC QLQ-C30 in prostate cancer clinical trials

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Size and composition of family networks of decedents: A nationwide register-based study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: Seriously ill patients often depend on their informal caregivers to help and support them through the disease course. This study investigated informal cancer caregivers' experiences of caregiving tasks and consequences and how caregiver status (primary vs. non-primary caregiver) and the caregiver's relationship to the patient (spouse/partner, etc.) are related to these experiences.

METHODS: In a cross-sectional questionnaire study, randomly selected cancer patients with a range of diagnoses and disease stages were invited to pass on the 'Cancer Caregiving Tasks, Consequences and Needs Questionnaire' (CaTCoN) to 1-3 of their caregivers.

RESULTS: A total of 590 caregivers related to 415 (55% of 752 eligible) cancer patients participated. Large proportions of caregivers experienced substantial caregiving workload, e.g., provision of psychological support (74%), as well as a range of negative consequences, most commonly stress (59%). Some caregivers experienced personal growth, but relatively large proportions did not. Caregiver status and the caregiver's relationship to the patient were associated with some caregiving aspects. Primary caregivers experienced the highest caregiving workload, and non-primary caregivers experienced most problems with getting time off from work. Spouses/partners and/or parents experienced the highest workload, most lack of time for social relations, most financial difficulties, and had the greatest need for seeing a psychologist. They furthermore experienced the highest degree of personal growth and had the smallest need for living a normal life while being a caregiver. Yet, regarding the majority of caregiving aspects, no associations with caregiver status or the caregiver's relationship to the patient were found.

CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the findings confirm that cancer caregiving is burdensome. The primary and the closest caregivers seemed to take on most caregiving tasks, but, contrary to expectations, regarding the majority of caregiving consequences non-primary and more distant caregivers were affected to the same degree as the primary and closest caregivers. Initiatives and interventions to support not only the primary caregivers are therefore warranted.

Original languageEnglish
JournalB M C Cancer
Volume14
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)541 (1-13)
Number of pages13
ISSN1471-2407
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Jul 2014

Most downloaded publications

No data available

ID: 44449706