Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
Bispebjerg Hospital - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
E-pub ahead of print

Benefits and harm of paracetamol and ibuprofen in combination for postoperative pain: preplanned subgroup analyses of the multicenter randomized PANSAID trial

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Inadequate emergence after non-cardiac surgery-A prospective observational study in 1000 patients

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Unannounced vs announced in situ simulation of emergency teams: Feasibility and staff perception of stress and learning

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Association between perioperative hyperoxia and cerebrovascular complications after laparotomy-A post-hoc follow-up study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Continuous vital sign monitoring after major abdominal surgery-Quantification of micro events

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Brain resting-state connectivity in the development of secondary hyperalgesia in healthy men

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Sensory distribution of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block - a randomised, blinded trial

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • Kasper H Thybo
  • Daniel Hägi-Pedersen
  • Jørn Wetterslev
  • Jørgen B Dahl
  • Janus C Jakobsen
  • Niels Anker Pedersen
  • Karina Jakobsen
  • Hans Henrik Bülow
  • Louise Ibsen
  • Søren Overgaard
  • Ole Mathiesen
View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: The 'Paracetamol and Ibuprofen in Combination' (PANSAID) trial showed that combining paracetamol and ibuprofen resulted in lower opioid consumption than each drug alone and we did not findan increase in risk of harm when using ibuprofen versus paracetamol. The aim of this subgroup analysis was to investigate differences in benefits and harms of the interventions in different subgroups. We hypothesized the intervention effects would differ in subgroups with different risk of pain or adverse events.

METHODS: In these preplanned subgroup analyses of the PANSAID trial population, we assessed subgroup heterogeneity in intervention effects between 1) subgroups (sex, age, use of analgesics, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and type of anesthesia) and morphine consumption, and 2) subgroups (sex, age, use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score) and serious adverse events.

RESULTS: Test of interaction between age and the pairwise comparison between paracetamol 1 g versus paracetamol 0.5 g + ibuprofen 200 mg (P=0.009) suggested lower morphine consumption in patients>65 years. However, post hoc analyses of related outcomes showed no interaction for this pairwise comparison. All other tests of interaction regarding both benefit and harm were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION: These preplanned subgroup analyses did not suggest that patients in the investigated subgroups benefitteddifferently from a basic non-opioid analgesic regimen consisting of paracetamol and ibuprofen. Further, there was no evidence of subgroup heterogeneity regarding harm and use of ibuprofen. Because of reduced statistical power in subgroup analyses we cannot exclude clinically relevant subgroup heterogeneity.

Original languageEnglish
JournalActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
ISSN0001-5172
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 24 Oct 2019

ID: 58261551