Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
Bispebjerg Hospital - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Are theory of mind and bullying separately associated with later academic performance among preadolescents?

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Progression Over 5 Years of Prelaminar Hyperreflective Lines to Optic Disc Drusen in the Copenhagen Child Cohort 2000 Eye Study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Psychotic experiences from preadolescence to adolescence: when should we be worried about adolescent risk behaviors?

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Low physical activity and higher use of screen devices are associated with myopia at the age of 16-17 years in the CCC2000 Eye Study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Cohort Profile: The Copenhagen Child Cohort Study (CCC2000)

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  5. Retinal arteriolar wall-to-lumen ratios at 16-17 years in the Copenhagen Child Cohort 2000 Study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • Lars Clemmensen
  • Jens Richardt Møllegaard Jepsen
  • Jim van Os
  • Els M A Blijd-Hoogewys
  • Martin K Rimvall
  • Else Marie Olsen
  • Charlotte U Rask
  • Agna A Bartels-Velthuis
  • Anne Mette Skovgaard
  • Pia Jeppesen
View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: Bullying and poor theory of mind (ToM) are both considered to negatively impact academic performance. However, it is unclear if they have separate effects.

AIM: The aim of the current study was to examine the potentially separate associations of bullying and ToM with academic performance.

SAMPLE: A general population sample of 1,170 children aged 11-12 years.

METHODS: Information on bullying, type of involvement (none, victim (only), bully (only), victim-bully (both)), ToM, and estimated intelligence was obtained at face-to-face assessments. Information on academic performance was obtained from Danish school registers.

RESULTS: ToM was positively associated with academic performance, and involvement in bullying was negatively associated with academic performance. Academic performance differed between types of involvement in bullying. Pairwise post hoc analyses showed that in the full sample, the only significant difference was between those not involved and those involved as victim (only). This was also the case for girls. Adjusting for potential shared variance with gender, estimated intelligence and ToM being victim (only) and victim-bully (both) were negatively associated with academic performance compared to no involvement. Thus, being a victim (or victim-bully) contributes negatively to academic performance beyond the effects of ToM and intelligence, and regardless of gender. Similarly, ToM remained positively associated with academic performance after adjusting for shared variance.

CONCLUSION: ToM and involvement in bullying were both separately associated with later academic performance. These results remained even after adjusting for shared variance, and for shared variance with gender and estimated IQ.

Original languageEnglish
JournalThe British journal of educational psychology
Volume90
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)62-76
Number of pages15
ISSN0007-0998
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2020

ID: 56109892