Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
Bispebjerg Hospital - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

An outpatient multifactorial falls prevention intervention does not reduce falls in high-risk elderly Danes

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Survival Prognosis in Very Old Adults

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Activity participation and cognitive aging from age 50 to 80 in the glostrup 1914 cohort

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Number of teeth and fatigue in older adults

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Insulin resistance is associated with multiple chemical sensitivity in a danish population-based study—DanFunD

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Conjugated C-6 hydroxylated bile acids in serum relate to human metabolic health and gut Clostridia species

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Influence of educational level on test and treatment for incident hypothyroidism

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of multifactorial fall prevention in community-dwelling people aged 65 and older in Denmark. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Geriatric outpatient clinic at Glostrup University Hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred ninety-two elderly people, mean age 74, 73.7%women, who had visited the emergency department or had been hospitalized due to a fall. INTERVENTION: Identification of general medical, cardiovascular, and physical risk factors for falls and individual intervention in the intervention group. Participants in the control group received usual care. MEASUREMENTS: Falls were registered prospectively in falls diaries, with monthly telephone calls for collection of data. Outcomes were fall rates and proportion of participants with falls, frequent falls, and injurious falls in 12 months. RESULTS: Groups were comparable at baseline. Followup exceeded 90.0%. A total of 422 falls were registered in the intervention group, 398 in the control group. Intention-to-treat analysis revealed no effect of the intervention on fall rates (relative risk=1.06, 95%confidence interval (CI)=0.75 -1.51), proportion with falls (odds ratio (OR)=1.20, 95% CI 0.81-1.79), frequent falls (OR=0.97, 95% CI=0.60-1.56), or injurious falls (OR=0.97, 95% CI=0.57-1.62). CONCLUSION: A program of multifactorial fall prevention aimed at elderly Danish people experiencing at least one injurious fall was not effective in preventing further falls.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of the American Geriatrics Society
Volume57
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)971-7
Number of pages6
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Bibliographical note

Keywords: Accidental Falls; Aged; Denmark; Female; Humans; Male; Medical Records; Outpatients; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Telephone

ID: 174365