Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Bispebjerg Hospital - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Taking no for an answer. Nurses' consultations with people with cardiac disease about rehabilitation: A qualitative study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Heart Rehabilitation for All (HeRTA): Protocol for a feasibility study and pilot randomized trial

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Risk Factors, Subsequent Disease Onset, and Prognostic Impact of Myocardial Infarction and Atrial Fibrillation

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskning

  4. Conditioned pain modulation and pain sensitivity in functional somatic disorders: The DanFunD study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  5. Insulin resistance is associated with multiple chemical sensitivity in a danish population-based study—DanFunD

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: Research shows that many people with cardiac disease decline cardiac rehabilitation. There is little or no knowledge on how health professionals respond to these people.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate how nurses respond to people who do not wish to participate in cardiac rehabilitation and what influences the nurses´ approach towards these people.

DESIGN: A qualitative study involving interviews and video-recordings using an analysis inspired by ethnographic principles and categorisation theory.

SETTING: A rehabilitation clinic at a large hospital in the Capital Region of Denmark.

PARTICIPANTS: Five cardiac nurses and 28 people with cardiac disease.

METHODS: We video-recorded the first consultation people with cardiac disease attended regarding cardiac rehabilitation, where the nurses followed up on these people's recovery, medication, lifestyle and need for rehabilitation. We conducted semi-structured interviews with the cardiac nurses. We asked the nurses about the purpose of the first rehabilitation consultation and how they handle people with cardiac disease who say no to rehabilitation. The nurses were shown video-clips with the people they had talked to in their consultation in order to facilitate a dialogue.

RESULTS: When people with cardiac disease were reluctant to participate in rehabilitation, the nurses made an individual assessment of how much effort to put into motivating them, taking a complex range of factors into account. The effort among the nurses towards people with cardiac disease who decline rehabilitation was smaller in cases when the nurses believed an individual would benefit less from rehabilitation or have difficulty participating. It was important for the nurses to balance their motivational efforts with showing respect for people's autonomy.

CONCLUSION: Even when nurses endorse rehabilitation, some people with cardiac disease decline rehabilitation. The nurses' recommendation of the rehabilitation programme is influenced by the knowledge they obtain about the people with cardiac disease during consultations.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummer151397
TidsskriftApplied Nursing Research
Vol/bind58
Sider (fra-til)151397
ISSN0897-1897
DOI
StatusUdgivet - apr. 2021

ID: 64486711