Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Bispebjerg Hospital - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Modulation of fronto-parietal connections during the rubber hand illusion

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Harvard

Karabanov, AN, Ritterband-Rosenbaum, A, Christensen, MS, Siebner, HR & Nielsen, JB 2017, 'Modulation of fronto-parietal connections during the rubber hand illusion' European Journal of Neuroscience, bind 45, nr. 7, s. 964-974. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13538

APA

Karabanov, A. N., Ritterband-Rosenbaum, A., Christensen, M. S., Siebner, H. R., & Nielsen, J. B. (2017). Modulation of fronto-parietal connections during the rubber hand illusion. European Journal of Neuroscience, 45(7), 964-974. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13538

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Author

Karabanov, Anke Ninija ; Ritterband-Rosenbaum, Anina ; Christensen, Mark Schram ; Siebner, Hartwig Roman ; Nielsen, Jens Bo. / Modulation of fronto-parietal connections during the rubber hand illusion. I: European Journal of Neuroscience. 2017 ; Bind 45, Nr. 7. s. 964-974.

Bibtex

@article{0b285fe6531945af88dc07cb92d8a8c3,
title = "Modulation of fronto-parietal connections during the rubber hand illusion",
abstract = "Accumulating evidence suggests that parieto-frontal connections play a role in adjusting body ownership during the Rubber Hand Illusion (RHI). Using a motor version of the rubber hand illusion paradigm, we applied single-site and dual-site transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to investigate cortico-spinal and parietal-frontal connectivity during perceived rubber hand ownership. Healthy volunteers received a conditioning TMS pulse over left anterior intraparietal sulcus (aIPS) and a test TMS pulse over left primary motor cortex (M1). Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) were recorded at rest and during three RHI conditions: a) agency and ownership, b) agency but no ownership and c) neither agency nor ownership. Parietal-motor communication differed among experimental conditions. The induction of action ownership was associated with an inhibitory parietal-to-motor connectivity, which was comparable to the aIPS-to-M1 inhibition present at rest. This aIPS-to-M1 inhibition disappeared during movement conditions not inducing ownership. Cortico-spinal excitability was not significantly modulated during the motor RHI as indicated by the task-constant MEP amplitude elicited by the M1 test pulse alone. Our results indicate that the perceived ownership over the rubber hand is associated with normal parietal-motor communication. This communication is disturbed if the sensorimotor conflict between one's own hand and the rubber hand is not resolved. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.",
author = "Karabanov, {Anke Ninija} and Anina Ritterband-Rosenbaum and Christensen, {Mark Schram} and Siebner, {Hartwig Roman} and Nielsen, {Jens Bo}",
note = "This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/ejn.13538",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "964--974",
journal = "European Journal of Neuroscience",
issn = "0953-816X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modulation of fronto-parietal connections during the rubber hand illusion

AU - Karabanov, Anke Ninija

AU - Ritterband-Rosenbaum, Anina

AU - Christensen, Mark Schram

AU - Siebner, Hartwig Roman

AU - Nielsen, Jens Bo

N1 - This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - Accumulating evidence suggests that parieto-frontal connections play a role in adjusting body ownership during the Rubber Hand Illusion (RHI). Using a motor version of the rubber hand illusion paradigm, we applied single-site and dual-site transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to investigate cortico-spinal and parietal-frontal connectivity during perceived rubber hand ownership. Healthy volunteers received a conditioning TMS pulse over left anterior intraparietal sulcus (aIPS) and a test TMS pulse over left primary motor cortex (M1). Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) were recorded at rest and during three RHI conditions: a) agency and ownership, b) agency but no ownership and c) neither agency nor ownership. Parietal-motor communication differed among experimental conditions. The induction of action ownership was associated with an inhibitory parietal-to-motor connectivity, which was comparable to the aIPS-to-M1 inhibition present at rest. This aIPS-to-M1 inhibition disappeared during movement conditions not inducing ownership. Cortico-spinal excitability was not significantly modulated during the motor RHI as indicated by the task-constant MEP amplitude elicited by the M1 test pulse alone. Our results indicate that the perceived ownership over the rubber hand is associated with normal parietal-motor communication. This communication is disturbed if the sensorimotor conflict between one's own hand and the rubber hand is not resolved. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

AB - Accumulating evidence suggests that parieto-frontal connections play a role in adjusting body ownership during the Rubber Hand Illusion (RHI). Using a motor version of the rubber hand illusion paradigm, we applied single-site and dual-site transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to investigate cortico-spinal and parietal-frontal connectivity during perceived rubber hand ownership. Healthy volunteers received a conditioning TMS pulse over left anterior intraparietal sulcus (aIPS) and a test TMS pulse over left primary motor cortex (M1). Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) were recorded at rest and during three RHI conditions: a) agency and ownership, b) agency but no ownership and c) neither agency nor ownership. Parietal-motor communication differed among experimental conditions. The induction of action ownership was associated with an inhibitory parietal-to-motor connectivity, which was comparable to the aIPS-to-M1 inhibition present at rest. This aIPS-to-M1 inhibition disappeared during movement conditions not inducing ownership. Cortico-spinal excitability was not significantly modulated during the motor RHI as indicated by the task-constant MEP amplitude elicited by the M1 test pulse alone. Our results indicate that the perceived ownership over the rubber hand is associated with normal parietal-motor communication. This communication is disturbed if the sensorimotor conflict between one's own hand and the rubber hand is not resolved. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

U2 - 10.1111/ejn.13538

DO - 10.1111/ejn.13538

M3 - Journal article

VL - 45

SP - 964

EP - 974

JO - European Journal of Neuroscience

JF - European Journal of Neuroscience

SN - 0953-816X

IS - 7

ER -

ID: 49845603